This year we’re introducing a number of interactive sessions where attendees can ask questions and explore key issues with others in the room. Designed to complement the wider program, they create space for open exchange and shared thinking.
Context and challenge
As AI systems become the primary way people and applications access information, the semantic layer (ontologies, knowledge graphs, and contextual metadata) has moved from nice‑to‑have to critical infrastructure. Yet many organisations still struggle to decide when to invest in graphs, how to manage change, and how to align semantic work with data and AI teams.
Meeting the challenge
This collective roundtable discussion focuses on answers to questions that increasingly determine whether semantic initiatives deliver real value or remain science projects.
Join the conversation, share your experiences and learn what others are doing.
Moderator: Dr. Robert Sanderson, Senior Director for Digital Cultural Heritage, Yale University
Organizations are increasingly evaluating large language models (LLMs) for content classification and tagging. While LLMs offer flexibility and can accelerate semantic model development, they also introduce considerations around consistency, explainability, governance, and cost.
This session compares LLM-driven classification, semantic classification, and hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both. Through practical demonstrations and real-world examples, attendees will see how AI-assisted modeling can accelerate semantic model creation, while semantic classification delivers consistent, repeatable tagging across large volumes of enterprise content.
There will also be an examination of an often-overlooked architectural consideration: cost predictability. As document volumes grow, content is reprocessed to meet new business requirements, and AI licensing models evolve, the cost of token-based classification can become increasingly difficult to forecast.
Lance Thieshen, Senior Principal Sales Engineer, Progress Software
Context
With the sudden growth and adoption of artificial intelligence, ontologies, knowledge graphs, and semantic layers are being viewed with renewed interest in biotechnology business operations.
Covering
Ahren Lehnert, Senior Taxonomist, Genentech
Libraries have cataloged the world's published record for over a century, but that description sits as text inside records rather than as identifiable things. We have spent the past several years rebuilding it as a knowledge graph. WorldCat Entities publishes descriptions of people, events, places, organizations, and works as persistent, resolvable URIs. The Dewey Decimal Classification is published on the same basis, which turns a familiar classification scheme into a machine-navigable hierarchy of human knowledge.
These identifiers have been integrated across OCLC data to improve our products and services and are also widely used by libraries and other cultural heritage organizations around the world.
Two decisions mattered most in the effort to build out our knowledge graph.
An important lesson we learned that can help every organisation working to build a graph is that a graph delivers its value at the point of linkage, so getting identifiers into the systems people already use is critical to success and adoption.
Jeff Mixter, Director of Global Metadata and Innovation, OCLC
Context
The Getty, based in Los Angeles, is a unique cultural institution, combining an art museum, library, archive, foundation, and conservation science program. Shared across all of these is a deep commitment to creating, managing, and sharing knowledge of the visual arts—as well as building the cultural heritage field's capacity to work with this information.
What we have done
Over the past decade, Getty has implemented the infrastructure and practices needed to unify its archival, museum, research, and imaging data by applying semantic technologies. Some of the work has been technical–building models, setting up infrastructure, developing taxonomies, and leveraging standards. But far more important are the social processes that enable the technology: building the internal capacity needed to execute this work and the willingness to look beyond disciplinary practice and consider what it really means to connect knowledge across an institution's many centers of excellence.
What we have learned
David Newbury, Senior director, Public technologies, Getty
More to follow….
Click here to register